CICEET Progress Report for the period 8/01/00 through 1/31/01

NCNERR Section [click here for Rutgers/SUNY Section]

Project Title:

Assessment and monitoring of estuarine habitat diversity: developing the tools to protect and restore estuarine habitats

Principal Investigator(s):

Steve W. Ross,
Dan R. Hanes, and
Susan Lovelace
(Roger D. Flood, Kenneth W. Able — see next section)

I. Accomplishments

  1. Scheduled Tasks:
  2. The major task was to be building the hardware to accept multiple sensor inputs (water quality, depth) and begin laboratory testing of the hardware. Along with this the software to run the system was to be developed and tested.

  3. Progress on Tasks:
  4. In August 2000 the project suffered a major set back when the main project personnel resigned. Consequently it was discovered that this person actively sabotaged parts of the project. We reorganized the project and after consultation with CICEET, we incorporated an additional partner (MARISYS, Inc.). MARISYS visited NCNERR to discuss the project in November 2000. As of December 2000 MARISYS has a subcontract with NCNERR (via UNCW) and has started working on the project. Basically the project is starting from the beginning; however, because of MARISYS’s experience and capabilities in marine electronics, we feel the project is close to original schedules. Because of budget problems resulting from the above personnel issues, we submitted a request for supplemental funds to CICEET, and this was approved.

    System architecture design, procurement of prototype hardware, and prototype software development have commenced. The hardware platform will consist of a small, custom designed, waterproof computer with connections for up to six instruments. The user interface will consist of a 1/4 VGA screen and five pushbuttons. The computer will run a customized version of the Linux operating system and will thus allow for very flexible future enhancements. A custom Linux build has been designed and will be tested pending delivery of prototype hardware. The electrical interface circuitry for the instruments has been designed and allows for "soft" configuration of each channel for RS232, RS422, NMEA or SDI-12 connections. The QVGA screen has been specified and samples have been ordered

  5. Difficulties Encountered:
  6. (see above)

  7. Anticipated Success in Meeting Project Objectives in Scheduled Project Period:
  8. We expect deliverables for field testing by late spring 2001.

  9. Preliminary data:

    None yet as all efforts are lab oriented.

II. Tasks and activities for next reporting period

  1. Tasks for the next reporting period:
  2. System design, procurement of hardware, and software development will continue. The prototype system (unpackaged) is expected to be operating in the lab by the end of March. A prototype field system should be available for in situ testing by late spring/early summer. Testing will begin at the NCNERR and after debugging (unknown time required) will proceed to other Reserve cooperators.

  3. Work plan to accomplish tasks:
  4. Appropriate hardware and software are on order or on schedule to be ordered. Personnel are assigned to design and write software as well as construct hardware. Consultation and visits between NCNERR and MARISYS are planned.

  5. Concerns or difficulties:

    None anticipated

III. Expenditures

(Note: Each institution’s grants office responsible for submitting financial reports, so all you need to do in this section is to state whether or not expenditures were in the range anticipated for the work accomplished to date)

Most budget expenditures during the period were for the subcontract to MARISYS. All expenses are as anticipated.


CICEET Progress Report for the Period of 8/01/00 - 1/31/01

Rutgers/SUNY Section [click here for NCNERR Section]

Project Title:

Assessment and monitoring of estuarine habitat diversity: developing the tools to protect and restore estuarine habitats

Principal Investigators (Subcontract via NCNERR):

Roger D. Flood
Marine Sciences Research Center
State University of New York
Stony Brook, NY 11994-5000
Phone: (631) 632-6971 FAX: -8820 Email: roger.flood@sunysb.edu

Kenneth W. Able
Rutgers University, Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences
Marine Field Station
800 c/o 132 Great Bay Blvd.
Tuckerton, NJ 08087-2004

 

I. Accomplishments:

  1. Scheduled Tasks:
  2. The primary goal for this work period was to conduct five days of multibeam mapping (flood) in the Jacques Cousteau National Estuarine Research Reserve in New Jersey. We worked in areas were information was available on habitat. Selected portions of these areas were the focus of in sin observations in order to ground truth the multibeam images (Able).

  3. Progress on Tasks:
  4. The MSRC/SUNY Simrad EM 3000 multibeam system was installed on the newly acquired R/V Pritchard for this study. The transducer of the multibeam system was tilted by 40° (emulating half of a dual-head EM 3000 system) to increase the swath width and to allow us to image near-vertical channel walls and the edges of the banks. Multibeam surveying was conducted from 17-21 July 2000. Mapping focused in two areas: 1) the channel and marsh bank near the Rutgers University Marine Field Station, and 2) several miles of the Mullica River near Hog Islands. Additional multibeam data was collected in other reaches of the Mullica River and in Great Bay.

    Ground-truthing is being based on historical SCUBA, ROV and benthic trawl data and in situ video. We are developing and using a video quadrat sampling procedure. The camera/quadrat is lowered to the bottom and allowed to record for 30 seconds at each location. These video images will provide habitat type and percent cover and eventually compared directly with the multibeam data from the same locations. To date, we have been able to correlate some of the images of the near-vertical channel walls in Shooting Thorofare near the Rutgers University Marine Field Station with SCUBA observations of large slump blocks (peat reefs) at the base of the wall. From other observations we know that these blocks of marsh peat are ideal habitat for larger juveniles and adult tautog (Tautoga onitis)

  5. Concerns or Difficulties:
  6. The multibeam system worked well, allowing nearly continuous coverage in the channels and along the edge of the marsh banks. We mounted the transducer about 0.6 m below the water surface. This was probably too shallow because air bubbles affected the quality of the backscatter data at some times. A major concern of multibeam mapping in shallow water is the amount of sea floor that can be covered in a given amount of time. The amount of time is also often limited by the need to survey near high tide. A second concern is the shallowest depth in which the equipment can be used. This is mostly limited by the draft of the survey vessel. The R/V Pritchard has a draft of about 40 inches, restricting operations to water more than 4 ft. deep at the time of survey. However, these concerns were anticipated and we will continue to address them in our Year 2 field work.

    In situ video ground-truthing was hampered somewhat during the summer by phytoplankton blooms in the study area, which drastically reduced the visibility. We are compensating for this by continuing these observations in the winter, weather permitting, because the blooms are not present.

  7. Anticipated success in meeting project objectives in scheduled project period:
  8. We met the project objectives of mapping in the Jacques Cousteau National Estuarine Research Reserve during summer 2000.

  9. Preliminary data:

    Initial bathymetry and backscatter data are available from the July 2000 cruise. Initial products were given to Able to help ground-truthing.

II. Tasks and Activities for the Next Report Period

  1. Tasks and the next report period:
  2. We are processing the multibeam bathymetry data to produce final maps and images on paper and in digital format appropriate for ArcInfo. We will interpret these data in terms of sediment distribution patterns and sedimentation processes. The bathymetric data will be integrated with available air photos to understand the exposed and submerged morphology. As other ground-truth data on benthic habitat becomes available, this data will be integrated into our analysis.

  3. Work plan to accomplish tasks:
  4. Final processing steps of the multibeam data include careful editing of bathymetric and backscatter data and integration with appropriate tidal data. We are seeking to acquire available air photos and existing sediment sample data.

  5. Concerns or difficulties:

    No difficulties are anticipated in accomplishing these tasks.

III. Expenditures

Budget expenditures for this period are primarily for the field mapping program. Expenditures are as anticipated.