|
||||||||||||||||||||
| CICEET Progress Report for the period 3/15/04 through 9/15/04 Project Title: In-situ monitoring of a reactive trace metal in riverine and estuarine mixing zones
Accomplishments
Progress on Tasks
Difficulties Encountered
Anticipated Success in Meeting Project Objectives in Scheduled Project Period
Preliminary Data
Figure 2 shows the location of the four sampling sites selected for SEAS-Cu deployment in the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Sites included (1) Goodland Field Station operated by Rookery Bay NERR, (2) the N. Collier Road bypass on Smokehouse Bay, (3) Faka Union Canal Weir (north side) and (4) the marina at Port of the Islands. Sites 1 and 2 were selected to represent what was believed to be tidally-mixed pristine site (Goodland) and a tidally-restricted canal site (N. Collier Bypass). Sites 3 and 4 are located at the head of the Faka Union Canal. The two sites were representative of moderate development along the canal system which drains into an otherwise highly-pristine portion of Faka Union Bay (part the 10,000 Islands system in Rookery Bay proper). Table 1 lists SEAS-Cu deployment locations in Rookery Bay, dates, length of deployment, quality of the data and description of the problems encountered during the deployment cycles. For all recovered data sets copper estimates appeared to be at or below the detection limits of the current SEAS-Cu instrument configuration. Only a limited number of quality data points were recovered from each of the deployment cycles. The main issue effecting data quality were bubble problems that could have been addressed at the beginning of each deployment cycle had real-time data feedback been available. The challenge associated with recovering quality data during remote testing of the SEAS analysis system underscored the need for real-time communication with the instrument. The approach taken to proved real-time feedback of SEAS data was to retrofit SEAS with a telemetry system. Adding telemetry capabilities to SEAS allows users to monitor the instrument’s performance, take abortive or corrective action during the deployment cycle and to remotely control the pattern and timing of sampling. A preliminary SEAS telemetry system has been configured and tested in the laboratory. The current SEAS telemetry system was shown to successfully provide remote control and operation of SEAS and provided real-time streaming of data via a Hyperterminal session. The system is currently being integrated into the USF College of Marine Science (CMS) network. Figure 3 shows a conceptual schematic of the intended SEAS telemetry system. Tasks and activities for the next reporting period
Tasks for the next reporting period
Work plan to accomplish tasks
Concerns or difficulties
Expenditures
|
|