|
||||||||||||||||
| CICEET Progress Report for the period 2/1/03 through 8/31/03 Project Title: Remotely Sensed Indices of Land Use Intensity for Watershed-level Monitoring
Accomplishments
Progress on Tasks
Using the results of the SOM model described previously, we have estimated land use intensity for 25 subwatersheds in the Mullica Rivers basin study area. R. Zampella, project co-investigator, has conducted the statistical analysis comparing the subwatershed land uses components vs. water quality data. We also compared our TM derived estimates with the NJDEP land use and impervious surface estimates. Model results were then compared with an additional 20 basins (data not used in model fitting) as further validation. 4 different models were compared: LU (3 categories) - NJDEP LU/LC: Development, Upland Agriculture, Wetland Agriculture LU & IS (3 categories) - NJDEP LU/LC: Impervious Surface, Upland Agriculture, Wetland Agriculture TMIS & L & AG (4 categories) - TM derived Impervious surface, Lawn, NJDEP LU/LC Upland Agriculture, Wetland Agriculture TMIS+L & AG (3 categories) - TM derived Impervious surface and Lawn combined, NJDEP LU/LC Upland Agriculture, Wetland Agriculture The statistical analysis shows that the Landsat TM derived results had slightly lower coefficient of determination (R2) than using the NJDEP derived land use or impervious surface data. For example, in the pH model, the NJDEP LU model had an R2 of 0.87, the NJDEP IS/AG model had an R2 of 0.83 and the TM derived IS, Lawn and NJDEP AG models had R2 of 0.79 (see Table 1). The model results for the other chemical constituents showed similar patterns. There was no statistically significant difference between the different models when compared against the validation data (see Table 2). There were no issues related to the residuals of the models (Table 3). In other words, the Landsat TM derived estimates of land use intensity provided similar explanatory power in understanding nonpoint source pollution levels in various coastal watershed basins as compared to traditional means of measuring human urban land use intensity (e.g., aerial photo interpreted urban area or impervious surface). Thus we think that the remote sensing methods we have developed will find useful application in monitoring upland land use and estimating attendant effects on coastal waters.
Difficulties Encountered
Anticipated Success in Meeting Project Objectives in Scheduled Project Period
Preliminary Data
Tasks and activities for the next reporting period
Tasks for the next reporting period
Present results to state level project cooperators for possible implementation.
Work plan to accomplish tasks
Concerns or difficulties
Expenditures
|
|