|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CICEET Progress Report for the period 9/01/01 through 3/01/02
Project Title: Development of Beneficial Use Alternatives for the Management of Dredged, Contaminated Sediments
Accomplishments
As reported in the last progress report, the tasks scheduled for this reporting period were as follows:
Progress on Tasks
The pH-static test data to this point has been compiled (see "Preliminary Data") and more data continues to be collected to improve the accuracy of these results. Total contaminant concentrations have been determined via acid digestion procedures, to assess a material mass balance and ultimately quantify volatilization. Evaluation of contaminant phases using XPS is at hand and will confirm conclusions from pH-static work. Raw feed slurries containing varying amounts of DM (0%, 1.5%, 6.63%, and 12.5%) were proportioned, measured, blended, and then ground in a ceramic ball mill in the laboratory. These slurries were then used to manufacture small amounts of portland cement clinker with a muffle furnace in the laboratory at the bench scale. The clinkers produced were ground again in a ball mill and analyzed with XRPD (see results in "Preliminary Data"). The high chloride concentration of the DM, and subsequently the raw slurry and clinker produced with the DM has been investigated. This has been done through literature review and discussions with "experts" from cement plants, as well experiments in the lab. To date it has become apparent that high chloride contents are mostly a problem with the cement manufacturing process as the chlorides volatilize during the heating process and cause problems with scaling in the kiln and pollution control devices. As a result there is no definite chloride limit in the cement slurry; it is more a function of the manufacturing facility's components as well as the process used- wet or dry. Mixing ammonium nitrate into the raw mix to complex with the chlorides and cause them to volatilize at lower temperatures was investigated. The presence of the ammonium nitrate did not appear to result in volatilization of chloride at 400°C as expected. Results from this investigation are reported in Section E "Preliminary Data".
Dissemination Activities
Weimer, M., J. Dalton, K.H. Gardner, B.J. Magee, "Beneficial Use of Contaminated Materials in Portland Cement Manufacture for Sustainable Resource Management," Environmental Engineering and Policy (Submitted 9/01). Dalton, J., M. Weimer, K.H. Gardner, B.J. Magee, "Engineering Aspects Governing the Beneficial Use of Dredged Materials in Cement Manufacturing," In Beneficial Use of Recycled Materials in Transportation Applications, T.T.Eighmy Eds., Air and Waste Management Association Press (In Press). Gardner, K.H., B.J. Magee, M. Weimer, J. Dalton, "Beneficial Use of Dredged Materials in Portland Cement Manufacture," International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, Venice, Italy, October, 2001.
Difficulties Encountered
Anticipated Success in Meeting Project Objectives in Scheduled Project Period
Preliminary Results
Further studies of contaminant availability are underway by means of pH-static testing. Clinker mixes as well as slurry mixes have been tested; Figures 2-4 show initial clinker results. It is not surprising that at extreme pH conditions yield the highest contaminant availability. Cadmium availability, as shown in Figure 2, appears not to change significantly with pH changes. Figure 3 shows lead availability increases in the high pH range when clinker is made with dredged material. Leaching of zinc from the clinker mixes (Figure 4) all follow a similar pattern aside from the outlier. More data collection is in progress to improve the confidence of contaminant availability conclusions. To quantify the amount of trace heavy metal contaminants volatilized through manufacturing Portland cement, extraction Method 3050B analyzed by Method 6010B was again followed. 3g samples of each: dredged material (DMA), control slurry, control clinker, high clinker (12%), medium clinker (6.5%), and low clinker (1.5%), were analyzed by Resource Laboratories in Portsmouth, NH, to find total contaminant concentrations, shown in Table 1. Using the DMA and Slurry Control values, different slurry mixtures were proportioned as follows: 0.015 * DMA + 0.985 * Slurry Control = Low Slurry This calculation example was followed for each element, and for both the Medium and High Slurry mixes (see Table 2) Volatilization was calculated by subtracting predicted total contaminant concentration (Table 1) from measured total concentrations in the clinker (Table 2). This assumes that if we start with the amount in the slurry and end with the amount in the clinker, the remainder volatilized. Table 3 shows the results of these volatilized quantifications. The Control reported in Table 3 represents the Control Slurry and Control Clinker analysis. The negative values represent an increase in contamination as opposed to the expected decrease due to volatilization. It is important to keep in mind some possible sources of errors:
To insure clinker quality, X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) analysis was conducted. A plot of XRPD scans of the clinker samples manufactured with varying amounts of dredged material compared to the control is shown in Figure 5. The XRPD patterns suggest that there are no significant differences in cement composition as a result of the addition of dredged material into the manufacturing process. The minimal variations do not follow a pattern and are more likely due to normal fluctuations in clinker formation. Results of the NH4NO3 experiment are reported in Figure 6. The chloride concentration of the samples after heating to 400°C are shown on the y-axis with the corresponding molar ratio of NH4NO3:Cl- on the x-axis. After seeing that the presence of NH4NO3 appeared to have no affect on the volatilization of the chloride in the slurry after heating the samples to 400°C, it was decided to heat the samples to higher temperatures. Figure 7 shows the chloride concentrations in the "A" (control) and "E" batches of slurry after heating the samples to 400, 600, 800, and 1000°C. This plot shows that the chloride does decrease after the slurry is heated to higher and higher temperatures as expected, with the exception of a slight increase between 800 and 1000°C. Both slurry batches show similar chloride concentrations which further reinforces the observation made after the first phase of this experiment: the presence of NH4NO3 has no affect on the temperature at which the free chloride volatilizes. The sample from slurry batch E heated to 1000°C does show a slight decrease in free chloride concentration compared to the control, but this is likely not significant.
Tasks and activities for next reporting period
Work plan to accomplish tasks
Concerns or difficulties
Expenditures
|
|